Helping cataloguers catch-up on their training: IFLA/LRM Training

 The issue of developing and implementing new cataloguing and metadata standards and models is one that has been with us for the past few decades.  While cataloguers have been slowly changing their practices - especially since the introduction of RDA about 8 years ago, many other library workers aren't aware that there is a plan in the works for a metadata revolution.  Or, maybe they know about it but perhaps they don't care.  I remember a librarian tell me a few years ago that she just couldn't get excited let alone be interested in my talk about RDA.  She felt that there has been too much talk and too little action for her tastes.

The reality is that the discipline of cataloguing and metadata is talking about revolutionary change. Making that change takes a lot of thinking, talking, planning, and experimentation.  I've shown non-cataloging librarians some of the experimental tools such as OCLCs Classify (http://classify.oclc.org/classify2/ ), Worldcat Identities (https://www.worldcat.org/identities/) and VIAFs authority data (https://viaf.org/) as examples of the outcome of experimentation and a preview of what is to come.  While some are interested in the services, they react to them as if they are just fun little toys and not evidence of steps being taken towards a brave new world in cataloguing and resource discovery.

Hopefully, some of my readers have a more positive experience than I have when they speak to other library workers about current and upcoming changes in cataloguing and metadata.  However, based on conversations I've had with other cataloguers at conferences, it sounds like a lackluster response from colleagues regarding these changes is unfortunately common.  Sometimes, even the managers of the technical services area arent too interested in hearing about what's coming down the pipe in cataloguing. That's a problem.  Maybe that will be a topic of discussion for a future post if readers are interested....

So, maybe it's not entirely surprising to hear that a lot of cataloguers and metadata librarians have had a hard time finding the time and intellectual energy to learn the latest about the LRM model.  I have to admit that keeping up to date with the training has fallen off my radar in the past year or so.  I think that the last day I spent any time thinking about it was a very cold winter day when I was trying to make sense of the concepts of nomen and res in terms of how they might help with improving serials cataloguing.   I suppose I could say that the holidays and then a deadly virus that sent us into isolation overtook the little bit of attention I had left.  The other day I thought that it might be time for me to pick up my quest to keep up with LRM development.

One thing that I found is that the Catalogers Learning Workshop (CLW) added some training on serials cataloguing and LRM.  So, maybe this is where I can pick up where I felt off.

I thought that the readers of this column may be interested in the LRM training series that is available through the CLW website https://www.loc.gov/catworkshop/RDA2020/index.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Metadata Update #20: April 2014 RDA updates

This blog post was originally intended to be posted in June 2014: I’ve finally gotten around to completing my reading about the April 2014 changes to RDA.   As is the case with reading the details of any descriptive cataloging standard, it’s enough to either give you a headache or put you to sleep if you try to focus on too much of the detail at once. I do have a few comments to make about this update.   First of all, many of the changes are, in my mind, just clarification of the points which help to bring metadata creation away from the world of trying to fit as much information as possible onto a little index card and into a complex international information environment.   For example, it is reinforced that for serials you don’t assume that users understand that “v.” stands for volume.   Instead, volume should be spelled out as such as should issue.   This does make sense in an international, multicultural and multi-generational environment.   Certainly, for many users “v”
Read more

U.S. Indigenous Literature Awards Webinar

The ALA has announced a free webinar on October 22nd:  The American Indian Youth Literature Awards For more information and to register, see this website:   http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/american-indian-youth-literature-awards-discussion-and-reflection If you are interested in the webinar but can't attend on the date and time, register for it and you will get a recording 7 days latter. This information was published on the ALA website: Thursday, 10/22/2020 12:00 PM-1:00 PM (Eastern) 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (Central) 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (Mountain) 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (Pacific) Indigenous stories are all around us, but fewer than 1% of books published for kids in the U.S. are by Indigenous writers.US publishers are overwhelmingly ignoring the contributions of 574 Tribal Nations. The American Indian Youth Literature Award winners and honor books celebrate literature by Native authors and illustrators with the world. Each year AILA awards honor books by authors from different tribes and cel
Read more

Metadata Update #24 : Metadata as part of the user experience

Sometimes I find a blog post that puts into words the sorts of things that I have been trying to find a way to state for myself.  Erin Leach has written a blog post called "On metadata and user experience " which gets to the heart of many things that I have been thinking about lately: http://unifiedlibraryscene.blogspot.ca/2015/03/on-metadata-and-user-experience.html Sometimes in libraries we worry about what our discovery interfaces look like, the sorts of experiences our patrons have using them and whether the colours are attractive or not but forget about the metadata and the metadata quality which are often critical in determining whether or not patrons can find resources in the collection. I certainly have heard librarians, who work outside of cataloguing and metadata, say that they think that the new discovery layers can somehow magically "fix" problems with metadata.  There seems to be a belief that technology magically repairs records and
Read more