FAQs: Endnote, literature reviews, evaluating the articles and journals you find
FAQs: Endnote,
literature reviews, evaluating the articles and journals you find
The following are resources that support
the most commonly-asked questions from training sessions this spring.
Endnote
Unfortunately, not all of the features in Endnote currently
work for everyone. In particular, doing
searching within Endnote does not work for most and the features that
automatically searches for full-text PDFs of articles is only functional for a
few. However, most should be able to use
these instructions:
Cite while you write:
This feature will make it easy to insert
references to the papers you have in Endnote into a paper you are writing in
Word and to create an automatic bibliography.
I recommend watching the video found below
and experiment with the techniques she demonstrates.
Attaching PDFs to your Endnote citations:
When you’ve saved PDFs somewhere on your laptop, you can
attach them to the citation for that paper in Endnote by following the
instructions in this video.
Literature Reviews
Here is a basic set of instructions on the format of a
literature review. It includes the types of questions or topics you
should address: https://guides.lib.uoguelph.ca/LiteratureReview
There is a more detailed guide at the U of S on how to write
many different types of literature reviews. It focuses on the health
sciences but can also be applied to biology and agriculture. https://libguides.usask.ca/reviews
How do I know if a journal or journal article is “good”?
Resources selected for AAFC employees
These focus on ensuring that researchers do not publish in
bogus or predatory journals. You must be
on the AAFC network to access this page.
https://collab.agr.gc.ca/co/kis-sis/SitePages/Publishing%20Support%20Tools.aspx
Predatory Publishers
This guide from the University of Saskatchewan explains what
predatory publishers are and provide some tools and guidelines for determining
whether or not a journal might be a predatory one.
Junk Science
Junk science is the “fake news” of the world of scientific
research. If you search using tools such
as Scopus, Web of Science, or Ovid, you are not likely to encounter too much
junk science. However, there is an
unfortunate amount of supposed scientific research published on the open web
that is bogus. Sometimes it can be very
difficult to distinguish between good quality peer-reviewed journal articles
and false scientific reports.
This is an example of a guide for identifying and evaluating
junk science (plant science related):
Guide for evaluating the overall quality of scientific
information (AKA CRAAP test):
Comments
Post a Comment