Metadata Update #32 - Reflections on the status of the metadata librarian
Ever since I had the chance to change my focus in library
work 8 years ago, I wanted to be where the action was. I had spent many years working in public
services and had enjoyed doing reference work in the era before people Googled
everything. However, when the reference
desk started to get quiet, I knew that it was time to move on. I didn’t know where I was going to but I knew
that I was going to go to a place where I was needed and could help to be part
of building whatever the future would be.
I kept my mind open to opportunities and felt that I likely would work in
the area of electronic resources or electronic information in general. When an opportunity came up to develop my
skills in the area of cataloguing and metadata librarianship, I jumped on
it. At the time it made sense to me that
if people want to do most of their searching for themselves, we have to have
better and more agile metadata than we did at the time and I wanted to be part
of the movement that would build it.
I’ve felt a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment with my
work as I learn the new models and standards and do the type of work which was
once a mystery to me. I feel a sense of
pride that not only have I learned the basics of descriptive cataloguing,
classification, and authority work but that I’ve also learned FRBR, RDA, some
fancy footwork in MARCEdit, and, more recently, have been dabbling in getting a
grasp on BIBFRAME. I think back to all
of the time I’ve spent studying the twice annual updates to RDA and the new cataloging
community guidelines for applying RDA, time spent providing instruction on all
of this to library assistants, the one or two conference presentations I do
each year, the handful of articles published and the book that I wrote in only about
9 months on managing eBook metadata and I wonder how I did it all. I even started to write a column for Library Hi Tech News. Certainly, the past five years or so of my
life seem as though they have been both the most intellectually challenging and
productive of any time previous.
Shifting one’s career is certainly a lot of work but as I was doing all
of this, I felt that I was achieving my goal of being where the action is and
adding to the pioneering work that will help to make the bridge to the next era
in library work. Each year my professional development expense
fund is depleted after a single trip to ALA MidWinter and I find myself paying
out of my own pocket to take other training while evenings and weekends can be
filled with planning training sessions, reading email, preparing articles or
conference presentations or reviewing the most recent RDA changes. Sometimes I have definitely felt like things
are getting out of hand but it was ok because I enjoyed what I was doing and
felt like I was adding something of value to the discipline.
A series of major shocks hit me over the past 10 months or
so which have shaken my level of engagement and have led to me to question why
I am giving so much of myself to this new work. While I still believe in the value of the
work I have done this far, some days I wonder if I have it in me to
continue. Something had blinded me to
the fact that at my library I am a voice calling in the wilderness, or maybe
even more accurately, the proverbial tree falling in the forest. I really don’t know if anyone hears me
and/or, if they do, if they understand or care. The first shock hit when I prepared a file to
have my work, including my book, considered for merit. For those not familiar with the process,
librarians can make a report of their work and achievements over the past year
and argue that what they have done is meritorious and, if their peers judge the
work to be of value, will receive a raise in pay. Being
the only professional cataloguer at my library, I have the sole responsibility
for implementing RDA and training library assistants in it as well as keeping
up to date with all of the changes, setting up WorldShare metadata manager, and
doing all of the other duties which are often split among librarians at other
universities. Despite having a heavy
load, I was actually able to make considerable progress. I had my book published last year, published
a number of articles, spoke at conferences, received recognition from my
cataloging peers at other libraries, etc.
I felt that I had the strongest merit case of my career to date. I was shocked when I did not receive any
merit whatsoever. I was even more
shocked when I found out that my colleagues got merit for media appearances,
LibGuides, blog posts, and a handful of articles published. I had
created a LibGuide too but didn’t even report it because it just didn’t seem
like a big deal. The same was true for
my blog posts. At my library reasons are
only given for why merit was given as opposed to why it wasn’t given. The sort answer is, I suppose, that my work
lacks merit. However, when I spoke to a
librarian about why certain achievements in my file were overlooked, her reply
was “nobody cares”. Then as it began to
sink in that RDA was going to continue to change, a new FRBR model was in the
works and it seemed that new guidelines such as those for cataloging music kept
popping up and then changing, I decided that I should begin to push more
strongly to have another professional librarian who would also follow the
changes and developments and so that it would not all fall on me. At that point I was trying to question why I
was spending money out of pocket for training and as well as my nights and
weekends doing work when “nobody cares”. The second shock came when I was told that my
work is “just not important enough” to justify adding another librarian and
that I should just stop doing some of the work that I am doing if I can’t keep
up. The latter phrase is something that I have heard since I first suggested
that maybe we should have more than one professional cataloging/metadata
librarian way back in 2013. I went
around in shock for a few days after I received that message and then decided
to ask for clarification in terms of whether or not the intent was to tell me
that my work was unimportant. The
clarification I received was that my work is unimportant relative to all of the
other things that the library needs to achieve.
This hit me particularly hard.
Then, just a few weeks later an announcement that the library would hire
a third systems librarian was announced.
After that I was basically told that I would just tell the systems
department what all of the new standards are and that they would “decide” how
to implement them. I remember riding the
bus home wondering how this all would work and wondered how a programmer could
select a system where I would create NACO records after I “explain the
standards”. I asked for clarification as
to how this could be possible and I was told that they are “responsible for the
systems” and they need to “make the decisions”.
It then occurred to me that my colleagues really didn’t understand my
work. The library assistants whom I had
been teaching RDA for the last 3 years get it but I don’t think that anyone
else does. A series of other minor
shockwaves continued to rumble through my work days and I can definitely say
that for the first time in my life I have entered a condition of disengagement.
I’ve never been one to go around feeling sorry for myself
for a long period of time or to lay down and let things get to me so I need to
do something to lift me out of this condition.
I do believe in the value of what I’m doing and the direction that the
discipline is taking. However, I also
have to be honest about it being hard to keep going when a person can’t keep up
with things, can’t get any help and get repeated messages about the
unimportance of my work. In recent
months I have attempted to educate my colleagues about what I’m doing and why
it is significant and have been met with rolling eyes and the statement, “you
have to forgive us if we fail to get excited about this stuff”. While the library assistants seem to be very interested
in what I have to say and want to learn about the new things, I just can’t seem
to break through to my librarian colleagues.
So, this is an unusual blog post for me but I would like my
cataloguing and metadata colleagues to share with me their experiences and
ideas. Are others having the same
struggles? Have they been able to
overcome the struggles? Am I in an
unusually harsh environment? I’m willing
to work hard and I love the work that I do but it’s hard to keep going when I
have nobody at my institution with which I can share the work and keep getting
told that my work is uninteresting and unimportant. Funny, even when I worked in public service I
thought that cataloguing was a core library activity and that it was important.
I had no idea that so many librarians don’t value it.
Donna,
ReplyDeleteYou are correct in noting a shift in the tides, in terms of cataloging. Things will continue to change and the consequences will be different for everybody.
That being said, I've worked at a few places where the emphasis was never much on C&M, but I've never seen a workplace that actively discourages someone from learning new skills and sharing it with the rest of the staff.
Honestly, the profession can't afford to have people like you being discouraged by the people who rely on you. If there was ever a time to move on to greener pastures, I would say this it.